The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on Thursday granted approval for SpaceX to proceed with its next Starship test flight following an investigation into a March explosion, expanding airspace safety zones and signaling strengthened international coordination with countries along the rocket's flight path.
The green light paves the way for Starship Flight 9 to launch as early as May 27 from SpaceX's facility in Boca Chica, Texas, pending weather and technical conditions. The FAA's decision comes after the company adjusted its flight safety measures and flight trajectory planning in response to previous debris fallout in the Caribbean region.
“With the Starship vehicle return to flight determination, Starship Flight 9 is authorized for launch,” the FAA said in a statement, adding that SpaceX has met “all of the rigorous safety, environmental and other licensing requirements.”
The 400-foot (122-meter) Starship rocket, central to NASA's lunar ambitions and SpaceX's commercial missions, suffered consecutive test failures in January and March, sending debris across parts of the Turks and Caicos Islands and nearby territories. The incidents led to international concern and cleanup efforts involving both SpaceX and local authorities.
The FAA said it remained in “close contact and collaboration” with countries along the rocket's trajectory, including the United Kingdom, Mexico, Cuba, the Bahamas, and the Turks and Caicos Islands, to ensure compliance and safety during future flights.
To mitigate risks, the FAA has widened Starship's Aircraft Hazard Area – the designated keep-out zone – from 885 to 1,600 nautical miles. The revised area now stretches further eastward, encompassing key sections of the Straits of Florida and parts of the Caribbean. The update reflects a new safety analysis that incorporates the use of a reusable booster for the first time, a critical step toward SpaceX's goal of making Starship rapidly reusable.
The FAA noted the changes were informed by “a complex mathematical calculation that heavily factors probabilities of vehicle failure and expected public casualties.”